Right from the beginning, a young, promiscuous girl tells you right up front (Yes. That’s you) about “how to avoid being a reject in high school” and lays it all out in screen texts and images while hollering at her parents. Only to end up being murdered by a serial killer known as “Cinderhella.” Then we’re quickly introduced to the cynical yet lonely outcast Riley (Shanely Caswell) the skateboarding hipster Clapton (Josh Hutcherson) the ditsy cheerleader friend of Riley, Ione (Spencer Locke) a nerd (Aaron David Johnson) and a whole slew of walking cliches who have become the next targets of this serial killer’s reign on a Saturday afternoon detention. Yet, that’s just the first twenty minutes. Throughout, the film is jam-packed with pop culture references dating back to late 80’s to early 90’s era to teen movies and a heaping wad of meta humor more excessive than any of the Scream films. Yet, what Kahn thinks he may be doing is fresh, invigorating and worthwhile, only adds up to being a cringe-induced migraine headache of a bloated narrative without any cohesiveness to be found, characters so thinly written without any dimensions to be had except with the archetypes they play of high school movies and overall; a achingly pointless endeavor of edgy humor passed off as “new” and “original” when it’s just incomprehensible to take in.
The cardinal sin this movie commits is that it torpedoes itself in its own uniqueness and ballsy narrative. Kahn desperately wants to break out of the normal conventions of narrative storytelling and wants to create something different yet enjoyable to be viewed upon. Yet, what he doesn’t realize is, without a narrative or any thread of cohesiveness to be had within this world, there’s no point to even be watched. The film is a jumbled mess. For the whole duration, it takes different turns of genre by introducing science fiction and teen drama all mixed in with an ambiguous horror element that by the end, it looses focus and direction to where the script might as well pull out any random genre element just because it can. For any consolation for those who see it, the first twenty minutes or so are the only story to be had with, after that, it’s “No Man’s Land.”
This is begging for the “cult hit” status that horrifyingly, might have its wish come true. It’s concealed by a fake guise of savvy dialogue and an eccentric tone that under the veil, it's an infectious attempt at originality, boasting a narrative without any respect for the convention of storytelling in general and is a blatant wastage of a person’s time. Every frame is composed with the intention of entertaining the mind while delightfully mocking you in the realization that it has gleefully wasted ninety-minutes of precious time. Truly, this is the absolute worst of the year that it can proudly proclaim the mantle of being “horrendously loathsome.” It ultimately becomes so scathingly exhaustive to decipher this barren-ridden wasteland of forgotten ideas, that one is praying for the closing credits to come to one’s rescue. Dismally, they couldn’t come soon enough.
Rating: F by Amritpal Rai
Couldn't disagree more.
ReplyDeleteI know a lot of people that really do love it, even admire it. I just fall in the opposite spectrum. I understand why you would disagree and I'm glad you loved the movie. Maybe after seeing it again in the near future I might change my view on it, but as of now, my rating stands. Just out of curiosity, what did you like about it?
ReplyDelete